Gambling

Caesars Vows to Stay Neutral in California Sports Betting Fight

Posted on: August 2, 2022, 11:35h. 

Last updated on: August 3, 2022, 12:28h.

Several entities are choosing sides in California’s sports betting debate. However, one major player in the gaming industry is choosing to sit this one out.

Harrah's Northern California
The exterior of the Harrah’s Northern California Casino in Ione, one of two tribal casinos Caesars Entertainment manages in California. On Tuesday, Caesars CEO Tom Reeg told investment analysts that the company was staying neutral on two sports betting propositions set to go before California voters in November because the company does not want to stand against its tribal partners. (Image: Caesars Entertainment)

Caesars Entertainment CEO Tom Reeg explained why to investment analysts during the Las Vegas-based company’s second quarter earnings call on Tuesday. He cited the “decades-long relationship” Caesars has with several tribal nations as the operator of their casinos. That includes the Rincon Band of Luiseño Mission Indians and the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians in California.

Most tribal gaming nations in California are backing Proposition 26, a measure on the Nov. 8 general election ballot that would allow tribal casinos and racetracks to offer retail sportsbooks. It also would allow tribal casinos to offer roulette and dice-based table games.

Next to Prop 26 on the California ballot will be Proposition 27. That initiative is backed by seven national sports betting operators who want to legalize online wagering statewide. Among those involved in the campaign are FanDuel, DraftKings, and BetMGM – operators that, along with Caesars, are generally recognized as the top four sports betting operators nationally.

We don’t want to be in opposition to tribal interests when we’re their partner,” Reeg said. “So, we’ve remained neutral in California throughout. You should expect that to be the case in any state where tribes are at odds with the commercial interests.”

Should either initiative or both pass, Reeg indicated Caesars would be involved in California sports betting. With nearly 40 million people in the state, it represents the largest market for US wagering.

“I struggle to think of a jurisdiction we would not go to in the US if it opens,” he told the analysts.

Bitter Campaign Likely

There are 13 weeks left until voters go to the polls in the Golden State, and all signs indicate the campaigns for and against the two measures will be hard-fought and costly.

Four groups registered with the state have reported more than $230 million in contributions already. And the rhetoric increased earlier this week when “Californians for Solutions for Homelessness and Mental Health Solutions,” the pro-Prop 27 group backed by $100 million from the national sportsbooks, released an ad that called out “wealthy” tribes for opposing the measure.

Besides providing funding for social services, “Californians for Solutions” also tout their measure as a way to bolster economic development for smaller tribes. The initiative calls for 15% of the tax revenue generated by online sportsbooks to go to a fund to aid tribes not involved in sports betting.

Prop 27 also requires national sports betting apps to partner with an in-state tribe to secure a license. It also allows tribes to operate online betting apps, albeit with restrictions.

Not long after the ad was released, several tribal leaders in the state denounced the ad.

It’s shameful to attack tribes that have a proven track record of sharing hundreds of millions with limited and non-gaming tribes like mine,” said Glenn Lodge, Chairman of the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe.These out-of-state corporations should stop the divisive and misleading attacks.”

NAACP Sues to Block ‘Misleading Statements’

There have been a few lawsuits filed already in California over the initiatives, with those coming from state-licensed cardroom casinos that are opposed to the tribal measure. But on Tuesday, another lawsuit was filed in Sacramento by the California-Hawaii State Conference of the NAACP.

The civil rights group accuses opponents of Prop 26 of trying to mislead voters by including a comment from Minnie Hadley-Hempstead, a 40-year member of the Los Angeles branch of the organization. In the suit, the state branch said it supports Prop 26 and that Hadley-Hempstead was deceived into issuing a statement.

“We are suing to prevent their misleading statements from appearing in the voter information guide sent to tens of millions of voters,” Rick Callender, president of the California-Hawaii State Conference, said in a statement.


Source link

Virginia Digital News

https://virginiadigitalnews.com is your news website. We provide you with the latest breaking news and videos straight from the Virginia USA.  number of posts: 960    number of comments: 0  

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
pinup